Home | Forums | Bible | +Width | Subscribe | Member Login

Saturday, March 17, 2018   11:58:46 AM  
 Welcome to The Omega Letter   Daily Briefings Commentary News Room   Contact OL Site Map How Do I?
Testimonials Prophecy Israel Globalism Terror In Defense Around the World War News Witnessing Perspective Commentary

Omega Letter Member Log In
Galatians  2 : 21
I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
Read Today's Proverb - Chapter 17
Why Subscribe?
Subscribe Online   Online
Subscribe By Mail   By mail
Public Registration



Zeteo 3:16 with Alf and Alesia Cengia




Ready Reasons - Wendy Wippel

The End The Book Part 6




Bible Prophecy News Christian Current Events

The Omega Letter Commentary Archives ...

Open Text: Exact Phrase:

Does Obamacare Cover Butt-kickin’?
Commentary on the News
Friday, October 12, 2012
J.L. Robb

After what happened in the first presidential debate, one must ask that question. Being confronted about facts instead of fantasy seemed to be uncomfortable to the president, and the body language certainly appeared so as Romney kicked his behind big time.

Interestingly enough, the new jobs figures came out shortly after the debate; and miraculously it was the largest monthly decrease in unemployment in decades. How could that be? Most of the “experts” were expecting the rate to go up to 8.2% but alas, everyone appears to have been fooled, or lied to. Could manipulation of the data be involved? What about the California data that wasn’t even included? Had to tune in FOX News to get that story, just like the fast-and-furious story and the Solyndra story. There are others too.

When I read or watch the news, at least the “mainstream” news, all I hear is about “Romney’s lies,” which have yet to be verified with any proof. The present administration accusing anyone of lying is almost laughable. Not since the days of Bill Clinton have so many lies and distortions been told by the White House gang. I am not using the term “gang” loosely.

“He lied; they died.”

How many times did we hear that mantra, over and over and over again during the Bush administration? The mantra was on the news, on facebook and twitter and thrown in my face regularly by a few of my Democrat friends… yes I do have some Democrat friends, nice people too. Most of them are voting for Romney this time around.

“He lied; they died” pertained primarily to Bush’s acceptance of most of our intelligence sources that Iraq was seeking nuclear weapons. Of course, it turned out that Bush didn’t lie, nor did the intelligence agencies. Intelligence is a tricky business at best. There is no “guarantee” that the sources of intelligence are flawless. They do the best they can with what they have.

This time around though, “He lied; they died” falls right into President Obama’s White House lap, and it has nothing to do with a “war for oil.” The most recent big lie seems to be the spin the White House put on the Islamic terrorist attack of September 11, 2012 in Benghazi and elsewhere. That lie led to the death of four Americans, including an ambassador who pleaded for but was denied by the White House, extra security.

Over and over we heard from the White House, the State Department and the talking heads that it wasn’t a planned attack (they don’t use the words “terror” or “Islamist”) at all but a response to a 15 minute youtube video that insulted “The Prophet.” Of course the video had been released months before without attacks; but coincidentally, this spontaneous attack just happened to happen on September 11. Does that strike anyone as odd? The Islamists have been rioting, attacking and killing Jews, Christians and one another for 1400 years. I am not sure what video the Barbary Pirates viewed on youtube.

According to the October 11, 2012 edition of USA Today, the following happened:

Prior to the September 11 terrorist attack, a bomb was tossed over the fence and on to the property of the U.S. Consulate that blew a hole in the security fence large enough for insurgents to enter. Then a U.S. diplomatic vehicle was hijacked and the British Embassy was set on fire. The White House and others involved in this cover-up blamed a 15 minute video, The Innocence of Muslims, released two months earlier for the “spontaneous” attack.

On September 8, Jamal Mabrouk and an associate meet to discuss the “frightening” security at the U.S. Consulate, according to CNN. These men were associated with the security force that protected the facility, the February 17th Brigade, a sub-contracted security force, not U.S. military personnel.

On September 11, the anniversary of the largest terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil, Egyptian jihadists attacked the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, the same Egypt we give millions or billions of dollars to each year. Embassy personnel condemn the “misguided efforts” of producers of the aforementioned video, in essence apologizing for hurting the “feelings” of Muslims. Then word of the U.S. Embassy attack in Benghazi is reported.

The White House admonishes Mitt Romney for publicly stating that the White House should not be blaming the video for the terrorist attacks, which the Obama Administration continues to blame.

On September 12, we learn that the U.S. Ambassador, Chris Stevens and three other U.S. citizens have been murdered. It is later reported that Ambassador Stevens was raped, though we didn’t learn if the rape occurred before Stevens’ death or after. For nine days, Hillary Clinton continues to blame the video, even though the leader of Libya says the attacks were premeditated and had nothing to do with the 15 minute flick.

President Obama continues to allude to the video, rather than premeditated terrorism; and he rejects the denigration of religious beliefs of Muslims. This rejection of denigration of religious beliefs occurred while an “artwork” named Piss Christ was on display in New York. So while Obama was schmoozing the Muslims about denigrating their beliefs, he said nothing about the jar of urine with a picture of Jesus inside that was being displayed in NYC.

In a TV interview with 60 Minutes, Obama refers to the attack as “… bumps in the road.” Republicans in the meantime have been told that the attack was a “well-planned assault” and not a reaction to the video. I saw this video, and I can only hope the producer didn’t pay the actors and actresses, as a first grade class could have performed better.

On September 13 the State Department issues a statement that they had “determined that the security at Benghazi was appropriate for what we knew." They didn’t know much apparently. Hillary Clinton continues to blame the video for the unorchestrated “violence,” and White House spokesman Jay Carney states, "The protests we're seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie."

On September 14 when the bodies of the four Americans arrived at Andrews AFB, Obama and Clinton continued to blame the video, rather than the hideous hate expressed, again, by the jihadists. Jay Carney again states that the White House was not aware of "any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent." That was an absolute lie, and they all knew. Obama lied; they died.

On September 16, a full five days after the planned and orchestrated attacks, an official appears on no less than five TV shows and again claims the attacks were spontaneous, not planned, a result of the “video.” This, even though the President of Libya continued to claim that there was “no doubt” that the attack was “pre-planned, predetermined."

On September 18, President Obama appeared on the Late Show with David Letterman and stated the following, in spite of the overwhelming, contradictory evidence: "Here's what happened. You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here … a shadowy character who has an extremely offensive video directed at Mohammed and Islam ... so this caused great offense in much of the Muslim world."

On September 19 Matthew Olsen, Director of National Intelligence, says the Americans in Benghazi were killed "in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy." CNN releases information from Ambassador Stevens’ diary stating that Stevens was “concerned” about security threats.

Nine days after the attack, Jay Carney finally states that it is "self-evident" that it was a terrorist attack. On the very same day, Obama is asked whether the attack was the work of terrorists. Here is his reply:

"What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."

September 21, Clinton admits to Pakistan’s foreign minister that "What happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack."

On September 25, Obama appeared on The View and is asked about Hillary Clinton’s statement. His response: "We don't have all of the information yet so we are still gathering," and that there is "no doubt" that "it wasn't just a mob action."

Continuing to blame every reason but the real reason, Obama tells the United Nations, “A crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world."

On September 26, Libya's President Magarief again states on NBC's Today Show that the attack was a pre-planned act of terrorism "directed against American citizens."

By September 27, more than two weeks after the terrorist attack, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says, "I think it is pretty clearly it was a terrorist attack."

On October 10, nearly a month after the attack, Senior State Department officials admit in a background briefing with reporters that prior to the attack in Benghazi there was no protest outside the compound. The briefing contradicts initial White House statements that the attack came during a demonstration against the anti-Islam video that got out of control outside the consulate.

In the end, the search for the truth will prove that the Obama Administration tried every way to cover-up the “truth” for political gain, though no telling how the spin will explain it.

So back to the unemployment information, minus California’s statistics: If unemployment made a near record reduction in a month, why did Georgia extend Unemployment Benefits another ten weeks for all the unemployed who have used all their benefits already? Why did Georgia’s and many other states have an increase in unemployment?

How were the figures calculated? I guess it’s just a “coincidence".

Obama lied; they died, and these figures are most likely lies too.

About J.L. Robb

Last week: Does God Like Compact Fluorescent Lamps?

Current Article Ranking: Average Rank of 4.49 Stars

Rank This Article: Rank this Article 1 star It's an article.
Rank this Article 2 stars It's informative.
Rank this Article 3 stars I liked it.
Rank this Article 4 stars Inspiring!
Rank this Article 5 stars It's a home run!

If you have already Registered, then Login and start a discussion.
Share on Facebook
OmegaLetter Exclusive Commentary
Disney, Pornography and Plague Booty from Ashes Global Warming The Seven Churches Christians and Courage that Matters
    Rss Feeds

Member Contributed Articles
Just Thinking Stage Setting On Steroids--2017 Prophetic Year in Review Professor Grant Horner's Bible Reading Plan Modified A Life (and Death) Worthy of the Gospel Sometimes Life Sucks but God is Good

Omega Letter Links
Fight For JoyGot Christianity?Hal LindseyJack KelleyJewish VoiceLion & Lamb MinistriesNow The End BeginsOilprice.comOlive Tree MinistriesOmegaletter MediaOther SitesProphecy TrackerProphecy UpdateProphezineRapture ForumsRapture ReadyReasonWorld Prophecy NetworkWorld Watch Daily

The Omega Letter Bible Prophecy Christian Intelligence