Archive for the ‘fascism’ tag
FBI Agents Raid Dallas Computer Business
The FBI executed a search warrant on a Dallas-based internet service provider by seizing three servers, effectively pulling the plug on at least fifty different businesses.
Matthew Simpson, the owner of Core IP Networks, said in a letter posted online that FBI agents raided two floors and ‘pulled the plug’ on his clients’ web servers starting at 6 o’clock Thursday morning. Agents also raided Simpson’s house in Ovilla.
According to Simpson, some residents’ access to 911 is also being affected because some of Core IPs primary customers include telephone companies.
The FBI isn’t commenting on specifics but said it could take several days to restore the servers of the affected companies. Officials say they could speed up their analysis of the web servers if the affected companies would contact them.
Simpson closed his online letter with the statement, “If you run a datacenter, please be aware that in our great country, the FBI can come into your place of business at any time and take whatever they want, with no reason.”
Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe
by John Hawkins
Once you’ve watched liberals long enough to understand how they think — scratch that, how they feel — they become extraordinarily predictable.
To begin with, the liberal agenda is, in many respects, the same as it was in the thirties. Whether you call it communism, fascism, socialism, liberalism, or progressivism, the only real difference is how much they believe they can get away with, the way they sell it to people, and the latest trendy name for what they believe.
So, once the liberals pick a policy from their stale program to push, the next step is to get it implemented. This is where liberals have problems because whether a policy makes sense, is practical, or actually improves people’s lives is of secondary importance to them. What is important to liberals is whether supporting or opposing that policy makes them feel good about themselves. Read the rest of this entry »
The article has
one response