Archive for the ‘socialism’ tag
The Bush Legacy: European Socialism
According to the prophecies of both the Old and New Testaments, the coming global government to be headed by antichrist will be headquartered somewhere in the revived Roman Empire. With that in mind, former Clinton advisor Dick Morris’ offers this interesting bit of perspective:
The results of the G-20 economic summit amount to nothing less than the seamless integration of the United States into the European economy. In one month of legislation and one diplomatic meeting, the United States has unilaterally abdicated all the gains for the concept of free markets won by the Reagan administration and surrendered, in toto, to the Western European model of socialism, stagnation and excessive government regulation. Sovereignty is out the window. Without a vote, we are suddenly members of the European Union. Given the dismal record of those nations at creating jobs and sustaining growth, merger with the Europeans is like a partnership with death.
In His Own Words . . . The Real Obama Agenda
Shortly after the September 11th attacks, Barack Obama gave a radio interview in which he outlined his vision for America. Of course, he was only a state senator and the idea that he’d ever be in a position to impose his vision on America was unimaginable — at the time.
Why Liberals Lie About What They Believe
by John Hawkins
Once you’ve watched liberals long enough to understand how they think — scratch that, how they feel — they become extraordinarily predictable.
To begin with, the liberal agenda is, in many respects, the same as it was in the thirties. Whether you call it communism, fascism, socialism, liberalism, or progressivism, the only real difference is how much they believe they can get away with, the way they sell it to people, and the latest trendy name for what they believe.
So, once the liberals pick a policy from their stale program to push, the next step is to get it implemented. This is where liberals have problems because whether a policy makes sense, is practical, or actually improves people’s lives is of secondary importance to them. What is important to liberals is whether supporting or opposing that policy makes them feel good about themselves. Read the rest of this entry »

The article has
no responses yet